﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marriage Shortens Woman&#8217;s Life</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/marriage-shortens-woman-life/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/marriage-shortens-woman-life/</link>
	<description>Magazine for Beautiful Women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:31:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight McDonald</title>
		<link>http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/marriage-shortens-woman-life/#comment-48547</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight McDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 18:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geniusbeauty.com/?p=2024#comment-48547</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t buy this study either.  There are just too many outside factors to consider ina non clinical study.  Were the married ones &quot;happily married&quot;?  Did the single ones have a &quot;friend&quot; or &quot;friends&quot;?  How do you really determine the real effect on a less tha 2% increase or decrease.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy this study either.  There are just too many outside factors to consider ina non clinical study.  Were the married ones &#8220;happily married&#8221;?  Did the single ones have a &#8220;friend&#8221; or &#8220;friends&#8221;?  How do you really determine the real effect on a less tha 2% increase or decrease.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeadScratcher7</title>
		<link>http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/marriage-shortens-woman-life/#comment-43259</link>
		<dc:creator>HeadScratcher7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geniusbeauty.com/?p=2024#comment-43259</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I buy it and here&#039;s why: women live longer than men, right? So with married couples that would mean the men more often die first ( But men do tend to marry younger women so perhaps this offsets - Who knows?) leaving the other to deal with all the stresses in life without the support of their spouse. None of these studies seem to address will to live, or the emotional makeup of the surviving spouse. For all we know this could be the major contributing factor overriding all other considerations of hormonal balance.

In the end, I believe it will all boil down to stress. As women in modern society more often take on the roles previously held by men in the workplace they add more stress. This can likely fully explain why womens lifespans have not risen as fast as men&#039;s. Perhaps there also needs to be studies done on the different types of stress and how the sexes handle them. For example, I imagine birthing a child is very stressful to a woman -physically and emotionally, but perhaps their bodies and emotional makeup have better adapted them to handle this stress better than say the stress in the workplace? Careful, don&#039;t read a supposed bias on my part into this where there is none. It was just a quick exaggerated example to make my point. I suspect if men had to try an birth a baby our hair would go gray overnight. lol

Likewise, stress from losing a spouse could also play a big role in longevity. Those who handle stress better (Is it women or men? Dunno.) may simple be those who get to live longer. Perhaps those who&#039;s health is fading struggle all the harder to keep living so they won&#039;t leave their spouse alone? Perhaps those who&#039;ve lost their spouse lose some of their will to live.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I buy it and here&#8217;s why: women live longer than men, right? So with married couples that would mean the men more often die first ( But men do tend to marry younger women so perhaps this offsets &#8211; Who knows?) leaving the other to deal with all the stresses in life without the support of their spouse. None of these studies seem to address will to live, or the emotional makeup of the surviving spouse. For all we know this could be the major contributing factor overriding all other considerations of hormonal balance.</p>
<p>In the end, I believe it will all boil down to stress. As women in modern society more often take on the roles previously held by men in the workplace they add more stress. This can likely fully explain why womens lifespans have not risen as fast as men&#8217;s. Perhaps there also needs to be studies done on the different types of stress and how the sexes handle them. For example, I imagine birthing a child is very stressful to a woman -physically and emotionally, but perhaps their bodies and emotional makeup have better adapted them to handle this stress better than say the stress in the workplace? Careful, don&#8217;t read a supposed bias on my part into this where there is none. It was just a quick exaggerated example to make my point. I suspect if men had to try an birth a baby our hair would go gray overnight. lol</p>
<p>Likewise, stress from losing a spouse could also play a big role in longevity. Those who handle stress better (Is it women or men? Dunno.) may simple be those who get to live longer. Perhaps those who&#8217;s health is fading struggle all the harder to keep living so they won&#8217;t leave their spouse alone? Perhaps those who&#8217;ve lost their spouse lose some of their will to live.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emma</title>
		<link>http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/marriage-shortens-woman-life/#comment-13504</link>
		<dc:creator>emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 16:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geniusbeauty.com/?p=2024#comment-13504</guid>
		<description>Quite informative and its really a sad news for loving husbands.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite informative and its really a sad news for loving husbands&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

