﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It is Proven: Men See Six Time Worse Than Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/its-proved-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/its-proved-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/</link>
	<description>Magazine for Beautiful Women</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 07:31:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: anton k</title>
		<link>http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/its-proved-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-582163</link>
		<dc:creator>anton k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/it-is-proven-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-582163</guid>
		<description>The article&#039;s claim is valid. The density of rods and cones on a human eye depends on two things: the location of the retina examined, and the sex of the species in question. 

A male has highly dense regions of these organic photon-absorbing cells right in the middle of the retina and the density fades off towards the sides of the vision. 

A female, on the other hand, while having the same amount of these individual sensor cells, the &quot;pixel&quot; density in the center of vision is not as high but it is indeed higher on the sides of her vision than that of a man belonging to the same species. 

As the correct wavelength of light with enough photon energy arrives to the rod and cone cells. In turn, the appropriate energy oscillation frequency (which must match the organic periodically-poled [with a period in the range of nanometers] structures) causes a voltage potential across them. This in turn commands to fire a single neuron packet via a discrete channel (which is protected by efficient organic insulation) directly into an appropriate location in his or her visual cortex.

Men (specifically those who feel threatened by this article), do not fear of being inferior due to this discovery, and rejoice, because the amount of “thick” cells that detect longer wavelength light is higher in men, thus giving you ability to see much better in the dark.

The fact that rod and cone retina density maps depend on sex proves the original theory which speculates that the vividness of color, the ability to see in dark, the ability to analyze multiple objects within the entire vision, and the ability to focus on a task, greatly differs between men and women. 

To recap:
----Men’s advantages: A) see much better in dark and B) see in ultra-high definition at the center of vision.
----Women’s advantages: A) see in higher definition on the peripherals of vision and B) detect color with a much higher accuracy.

I hope this clears everything up. There’s nothing wrong with being a man or a woman -- be glad that you have the opportunity to live. Some people don’t even get born, and some don’t even get conceived, and some are even too socially anxious to be attempted to be conceived. You’re lucky.

In case anyone is wondering, I have experience studying and applying electrical and computer engineering, optoelectronics, neuroscience, and psychology. However, I possess neither social nor verbal skills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article&#8217;s claim is valid. The density of rods and cones on a human eye depends on two things: the location of the retina examined, and the sex of the species in question. </p>
<p>A male has highly dense regions of these organic photon-absorbing cells right in the middle of the retina and the density fades off towards the sides of the vision. </p>
<p>A female, on the other hand, while having the same amount of these individual sensor cells, the &#8220;pixel&#8221; density in the center of vision is not as high but it is indeed higher on the sides of her vision than that of a man belonging to the same species. </p>
<p>As the correct wavelength of light with enough photon energy arrives to the rod and cone cells. In turn, the appropriate energy oscillation frequency (which must match the organic periodically-poled [with a period in the range of nanometers] structures) causes a voltage potential across them. This in turn commands to fire a single neuron packet via a discrete channel (which is protected by efficient organic insulation) directly into an appropriate location in his or her visual cortex.</p>
<p>Men (specifically those who feel threatened by this article), do not fear of being inferior due to this discovery, and rejoice, because the amount of “thick” cells that detect longer wavelength light is higher in men, thus giving you ability to see much better in the dark.</p>
<p>The fact that rod and cone retina density maps depend on sex proves the original theory which speculates that the vividness of color, the ability to see in dark, the ability to analyze multiple objects within the entire vision, and the ability to focus on a task, greatly differs between men and women. </p>
<p>To recap:<br />
&#8212;-Men’s advantages: A) see much better in dark and B) see in ultra-high definition at the center of vision.<br />
&#8212;-Women’s advantages: A) see in higher definition on the peripherals of vision and B) detect color with a much higher accuracy.</p>
<p>I hope this clears everything up. There’s nothing wrong with being a man or a woman &#8212; be glad that you have the opportunity to live. Some people don’t even get born, and some don’t even get conceived, and some are even too socially anxious to be attempted to be conceived. You’re lucky.</p>
<p>In case anyone is wondering, I have experience studying and applying electrical and computer engineering, optoelectronics, neuroscience, and psychology. However, I possess neither social nor verbal skills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hahahahaha</title>
		<link>http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/its-proved-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-453213</link>
		<dc:creator>Hahahahaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2011 20:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/it-is-proven-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-453213</guid>
		<description>Wow, the funny thing is women actually will beleive this tripe.

I&#039;ve said it before and I&#039;ll say it again. Women are petty vindictive sexist creeps who wallow in their narcisistic lifestyles and do nothing for the advancement of the human race but for procreation.

You all pay for nurturing and growing nasty personalities in your youth so when you go above 30 nobody wants you anymore.

Have a nice life all!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, the funny thing is women actually will beleive this tripe.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve said it before and I&#8217;ll say it again. Women are petty vindictive sexist creeps who wallow in their narcisistic lifestyles and do nothing for the advancement of the human race but for procreation.</p>
<p>You all pay for nurturing and growing nasty personalities in your youth so when you go above 30 nobody wants you anymore.</p>
<p>Have a nice life all!</p>
<p>HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pablo</title>
		<link>http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/its-proved-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-408677</link>
		<dc:creator>Pablo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 02:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/it-is-proven-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-408677</guid>
		<description>oh, so that&#039;s how our vision works... and that&#039;s probably why women are more prone to vehicular accidents huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh, so that&#8217;s how our vision works&#8230; and that&#8217;s probably why women are more prone to vehicular accidents huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/its-proved-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-102935</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 14:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/it-is-proven-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-102935</guid>
		<description>@ Truthseeker: Who said that men were incompetent LIARS (that&#039;s the spelling... ;P) ? I don&#039;t see THAT written in the article! If you can READ it properly... BOTH men and women DO WRONG... it doesn&#039;t say MEN alone... like... the hell??? It&#039;s an article that&#039;s trying to prove something of both sex but not one! Nothing is one-sided!
AND FOR YOUR INFO... NOT ALL women... if you categorize them in your hate... as beautiful, sexy and all that glamour DATE hunks or handsome guys! SOME actually CHOOSE NERDS! YES! NERDS! Sooo... if your hurt by that... being turned down by some sexy hot momma then MOVE ON! Cuz as the saying goes there are a LOT of fishes in the sea! My gawd... I dunno why I&#039;m arguing with you... But I just wanted to compliment this article which is great by the way! But somehow ruined my mood when I saw SUCH a comment... hmm... Thank you and I&#039;ll be taking my leave...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Truthseeker: Who said that men were incompetent LIARS (that&#8217;s the spelling&#8230; ;P) ? I don&#8217;t see THAT written in the article! If you can READ it properly&#8230; BOTH men and women DO WRONG&#8230; it doesn&#8217;t say MEN alone&#8230; like&#8230; the hell??? It&#8217;s an article that&#8217;s trying to prove something of both sex but not one! Nothing is one-sided!<br />
AND FOR YOUR INFO&#8230; NOT ALL women&#8230; if you categorize them in your hate&#8230; as beautiful, sexy and all that glamour DATE hunks or handsome guys! SOME actually CHOOSE NERDS! YES! NERDS! Sooo&#8230; if your hurt by that&#8230; being turned down by some sexy hot momma then MOVE ON! Cuz as the saying goes there are a LOT of fishes in the sea! My gawd&#8230; I dunno why I&#8217;m arguing with you&#8230; But I just wanted to compliment this article which is great by the way! But somehow ruined my mood when I saw SUCH a comment&#8230; hmm&#8230; Thank you and I&#8217;ll be taking my leave&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truthseeker</title>
		<link>http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/its-proved-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-92894</link>
		<dc:creator>Truthseeker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 02:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/it-is-proven-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-92894</guid>
		<description>This just proves that women, in fact, are worse than men.  You think we are incompetent psycological liers?  Look in the mirror, you are much worse than the true majority of men.  Let me guess?  You dated a complete jerk after turning down that sweet little nerd boy?  Great job, awesome show, you fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This just proves that women, in fact, are worse than men.  You think we are incompetent psycological liers?  Look in the mirror, you are much worse than the true majority of men.  Let me guess?  You dated a complete jerk after turning down that sweet little nerd boy?  Great job, awesome show, you fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Puma</title>
		<link>http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/its-proved-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-6224</link>
		<dc:creator>Puma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geniusbeauty.com/men-and-women/it-is-proven-men-see-six-time-worse-than-women/#comment-6224</guid>
		<description>Woah. I just found out, I have to be a guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woah. I just found out, I have to be a guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

