It is Proven: Men See Six Time Worse Than Women

He: Where’s the butter?
She: In the fridge.
He: I’m looking exactly here and there’s no butter.
She: It IS there, I put it to the fridge only ten minutes ago!
He: No, you must have stuck it somewhere else. There’s NO butter in this fridge!

Beautiful Woman’ EyeFor many this dialog will appear familiar. After these words She strides to the kitchen, pulls the fridge door and like with a wave of a wand takes out the butter-dish. Inexperienced men find it a mean trick and blame women for hiding things from them. Keys, underwear, socks, shoes – this all is here, men just can’t find it! But why can’t they?

The answer is hidden in our history. Very long time ago, when our forefathers lived in caves and had a warm in the fire in the evenings, men had to leave every day and hunt for food for the family. In order to see and follow the goal far off, the hunter needed the ability to see for long distances, everything else was set aside and did not draw away. And Clever Nature took care of men already in those ancient times. The field of the vision of the vast majority of men was formed like a tunnel: a man can see a plenty tight space, but far – and exactly this provides him the ability of hunting a distanced object.

In her turn a woman of those days stayed at home, took care of children and household and needed to have in view everything around in case of danger or threat to her descendants. That’s why the Nature programmed her in such a way, that if she looks at one object, she can also see everything around it within a radius of almost 180 degree. This explains the fact that she can find a thing in the fridge or wardrobe much easier than a man, who has only about a 30 degree vision radius.

Man’s Eyesight

What he sees: “Tunnel-like” eyesight of men (30 degree radius)

Woman’s Eyesight

What she sees: “Broad” eyesight of women (180 degree radius)

And this is why a man needs to turn his head right-left and up and down to find the “vanished” object. An average woman needs only to take a look at the open fridge to have the full sight of everything there and to find the object in seconds.

By the way, the men’s habit to gaze after beautiful women, which as often as not irritates and offends wives and girlfriends, is connected with these very particularities of men’s and women’s eyesight. In reality this doesn’t mean women don’t gaze after the nice men nearby – they also commit this sin, they just don’t need to turn head or focus the eyesight at the object.



Other News

7 Responses to “It is Proven: Men See Six Time Worse Than Women”

  • Chris says:

    @ Truthseeker: Who said that men were incompetent LIARS (that’s the spelling… ;P) ? I don’t see THAT written in the article! If you can READ it properly… BOTH men and women DO WRONG… it doesn’t say MEN alone… like… the hell??? It’s an article that’s trying to prove something of both sex but not one! Nothing is one-sided!
    AND FOR YOUR INFO… NOT ALL women… if you categorize them in your hate… as beautiful, sexy and all that glamour DATE hunks or handsome guys! SOME actually CHOOSE NERDS! YES! NERDS! Sooo… if your hurt by that… being turned down by some sexy hot momma then MOVE ON! Cuz as the saying goes there are a LOT of fishes in the sea! My gawd… I dunno why I’m arguing with you… But I just wanted to compliment this article which is great by the way! But somehow ruined my mood when I saw SUCH a comment… hmm… Thank you and I’ll be taking my leave…

  • Truthseeker says:

    This just proves that women, in fact, are worse than men. You think we are incompetent psycological liers? Look in the mirror, you are much worse than the true majority of men. Let me guess? You dated a complete jerk after turning down that sweet little nerd boy? Great job, awesome show, you fail.

  • Puma says:

    Woah. I just found out, I have to be a guy.

  • zero says:

    Who wrote this article? Where is the emprical data to back up its claims? what experiments did they conduct? How is it that the very vision of one gender could have changed to dramatically? What extraneous variables were ruled out? Maybe men in other cultures don’t do this? Maybe men in our culture don’t look long enough? or choose to focus on small things? or are lazy? The story seems a little bogus.

  • John T says:

    What a dumb sexist article designed to degrade man as a lust seeking animal gazing at woman with an IQ of 85.

    Contrary to most men, I have an IQ of 145+ off charts, I have a lifetime ability of 6th sense and energy reading of people and surrounding environements, liguistic verbal skills, and I can see perfectly fine 180 degrees in high definition. I may be more like a woman in a lot of areas and I am very proud of that. But I am here to say that article is sexists and even women and lesbians gaze at beautiful women — not just men. Men should be proud of their ability and the rights to gaze at beautiful women and take multiple partners at his pleasure — because that’s what Mother Nature entitle us to be. There has to be a pro and a con to be a man or a woman. Woman are beautiful, selfish in general — so the other side should be — weak men gets nothing while the strongest men gets multipel women, abiding by the law of nature.

  • Marta says:

    :) Good article

 
 

Leave a Reply

 

Related Articles

Copyright © 2007 - 2010 Geniusbeauty.com. All rights reserved. Copying is forbidden without the writing permission.
Optimised by Wpbloging